Luang Prabang- Saving Architecture but Losing Soul
Wat Xieng Thong |
Francis Engelmann, former UNESCO consultant, stated
'we have saved Luang Prabang's buildings but we have lots its soul'. Anthropologist
David Berliner refers to this as the ‘unescoization’; the development into ‘idealised traditions’ for the tourist gaze. Traditions like
the monks’ alms procession, as I've previously written about, have been affected by tourists turning the ritual into a performance to be
gawked at.
Some residents express frustration at the
restrictions on building supplies that can be used, as certain materials are
considered ‘inauthentic’. Unlike Western tourists they do not feel nostalgic about a pre-globalised past and want to build modern houses.
The essentialisation of Luang Prabang to its
architecture and heritage have reduced it, not allowing for
growth; or rather only allowing for growth to service tourism as many former
homes and small stores are converted into restaurants, travel agencies and even luxury hotels.
There is no clear solution, but
as student travellers we can recognise the ‘global construction of the local’ (Massey 1995); Luang Prabang shouldn't be viewed as an isolated pure slice of heritage but shaped by international relationships both past and present. Researching further and looking beyond what tourist companies push, helps us be both thrifty and mindful in our travels.
Comments
Post a Comment